#137: The Tuesday Night Bloggers – Threat Escalation for Younger Readers in Enid Blyton’s Five Get Into a Fix (1958)

TNBs Children

In much the same way that Hercule Poirot, Peter Wimsey, Roger Sheringham, and all other unofficial detectives of the Golden Age were unable to step out of their front doors without stumbling into some criminal enterprise, so The Three Investigators, The Hardy Boys, The Secret Seven, The Famous Five, and all others of their ilk always found themselves embroiled in shenanigans of one kind or another no matter where they went.

Yes!  The Tuesday Night Bloggers have returned!  And this month’s topic is Children in Crime; be they victims, perpetrators, bystanders, or sleuths, we’re onto it.  And with Blyton’s forays into youthful adventure among the most popular of this kind of thing, I thought I’d take a look at one and see what occurred to me.

It’s interesting to note just how many of the tropes of classic detective and adventure fiction it’s possible to find in the Famous Five books: here there’s a secret passage, a ‘most obvious suspect’ reversal, and the ‘surprising’ resurrection of a character believed dead, but elsewhere you’ll find evil-does masquerading as harmless types, a fairly decent least-likely suspect or two, even the use of identical twins to explain away some confusion…in short, if you’re looking for it, there’s a huge amount of crossover.

Not that this is all that surprising when you come to think about it – the nature of these stories inevitably puts them on the same plinth as classic detective fiction, just with the ‘detective’ part reduced and the ‘adventure’ element lifted an extra notch or two.  They’re still full of situations that must be taken seriously – kidnappings, theft, illegal activities, and in this particular book there’s even a sniff of international intrigue – but we’re dealing very much with a decidedly more jolly-what-ho-lashings-of-ginger-beer style adventure rather than an outright threatening crime.  Instead of danger, what we’re usually given is trepidation – the Five never investigate an out-and-out murder, or a series of poison pen letters, or the theft of over a million pounds from the accounts of a respected cosmetics firm – and while they often find themselves in some kind of risky situation, the way it is handled is very interesting.

Five FixIn FGIaF, Julian, Dick, Anne, and George descend from their life of white middle-class privilege to go skiing and tobogganing in the Welsh mountains.  Over the course of their stay they unearth some unpleasantness at a nearby house and, of course, resolve everything in time for cake and big smiles come the end.  As usual, this requires that they go up again a criminal enterprise engineered and run by adults, and of course the nature of the threat presented must be such that it a) is actually threatening but b) can semi-realistically be resolved by a group of meddling kids and their dog.  Simply dropping them into a room full of toughs holding guns would provide a) but not b), and so what is needed is evidence of their ability to deal with a) in a way that provides b) come the end.

I think of this as the comfort/threat/comfort model: everything seems fine, then a threat presents itself and is swiftly dispatched, then we move on almost as if it didn’t happen.  The ability to cope with a small threatening situation therefore lays groundwork for the larger threats to come.

There is, as always, the chance I’m slightly over-analysing this.

So, two examples: early on, having reached the idyllic farm of old Mrs. Jones and her mountain of a son Morgan, George takes Timmy (the dog, in case you’re unaware) out to meet some of the dogs owned by Morgan.  The dogs face off, Timmy is nipped on the neck by one of them, and George jumps in to defend him, the dogs are called off, everything is fine.  And then the following, hugely unusual, combination of emotions is written:

[Dick] couldn’t help thinking what would have happened if the three savage dogs had bitten George instead of Timmy.  Good old George!  She was as brave as a lion!

Now, sorry, but the second and third sentences there do not belong after the first in any normal sense.  Instead it’s the slow and careful accumulation of a sense of danger – there is a threat, the consequences of which are considered (never stated mind, just considered), and then Good old George is as brave a lion and so everything must be fine – and events move on.  Timmy’s wound s swiftly dismissed, though George continues to fret, but the immediate situation is safe again and Morgan’s dogs are set up as a linger sense of background menace to cast a vague miasma of disquietude over proceedings.

I wouldn’t buy into this myself if we didn’t also get this exchange between Julian and Dick about twenty pages later:

“Gosh – she’s absolutely fearless, isn’t she?  I’ll never forget her standing up to those three savage dogs!  I was jolly scared myself.”

“I’m going to get a rug and wrap it round me and sit out on the doorstep in the sun,” said Dick.  “That view is too marvellous for words!”

Like…actually what the hell?  In a weird sort of way – and bear with me here – this could be interpreted as Dick changing the subject as he isn’t comfortable with the idea of Julian expressing concern for George, except that it clearly isn’t: the boys go and sit in the sun and enjoy the marvellous view and the issue of George and the dogs is never mentioned again.  But again, the threat is established and dismissed: George was nearly ripped to shreds by three savage dogs, but look at the lovely view.  It applies an adjuvant effect to the menace – sure it’s there, but don’t dwell on it, dude, don’t be such a downer.  And the same message applies to the reader: sure, they’re not really in danger, enjoy the next 30 pages of skiing and picnics – this is escapism, after all.

I should probably make one thing clear: I think this is very cleverly done.  Because the Five, shortly after this, end up staying in a shack on the mountainside all by themselves (there’s an essay on the Orphan Principle here, I’m sure) and end up subjected to threats and sources of discomfort that aren’t so easily dispatched: sudden inexplicable tremors shake the ground, mysterious lights shine up into the sky, various adults offer help and a sense of dislocation at the same time…and in all of this, the sense of these characters being able to cope with a threatening situation – to dismiss it easily when there’s a personal risk, and so cope when the risk is more nebulous – is key to the intended younger readership being intrigued rather than distressed.

Compared to ‘pure’ detective fiction from this time, the contrast is rather marked: putting a dead body up against a bitten dog as the establishment of conflict seems rather tame, but in a way that’s my exact point.  The central section – mysterious tremors, lights in the sky, oddly friendly-yet-threatening strangers – could easily be lifted from an ‘adult’ novel (not that kind of ‘adult’ novel, you filthy-minded individual), but in order to work from the perspectives of a younger cast for younger readers the way threat is established and built must inevitably be different from the very start.  And while the Famous Five books may not represent great literature, they have a good idea on how these rules can cross both boundaries and so almost uplift this into feeling like a more grown-up read than it really is.  No mean feat, let’s be honest.

~

I submit this for the Golden Age Vintage Cover Scavenger Hunt at My Reader’s Block under the category A Red Object.

Advertisements

8 thoughts on “#137: The Tuesday Night Bloggers – Threat Escalation for Younger Readers in Enid Blyton’s Five Get Into a Fix (1958)

  1. Great post JJ. Having never read any of The Famous Five Books, I’d never really considered how they compare or interact with fully fledged detective novels though. Though from the extracts you’ve given I could see myself chuckling a lot at ‘jolly-what-ho-lashings-of-ginger-beer style’.

    Like

    • There is a lot of jolly hockey sticks and nonsense at times (at the climax here, they’re dispatched the fetch the police with the situation still not fully resolved and legitimately have to have a conversation about whether or not to stop and eat their sandwiches while en route…idiocy like that). But they’re a very innocent and fun way to pass an hour or two. Well, each one would probably take you more like 40 minutes…

      Like

    • I was always a Faraway Tree kid, so it’s been quite entertaining discovering them with my Classic Detective Fiction hat on. Weird how much they do fulfil so many of the requirements, though…

      Like

      • I grew up on Nancy Drew, the Hardy Boys and Trixie Belden (primarily) with Encyclopedia Brown and the Three Investigators thrown in for good measure.

        It is true that children’s detective stories meet so many of the requirements–I hadn’t given it a lot of thought before you pointed it out though.

        Like

  2. Pingback: Tuesday Night Bloggers: Children in Crime: Week 1 | crossexaminingcrime

  3. I remember loving these books when I was young. I think one reason they were so popular was that the Five had complete freedom to go off on their own and have adventures, largely without the intervention of adults. How we kids longed for that freedom! Blyton also wrote The Secret Seven series (very similar to the Famous Five) and many school stories.
    The Comic Strip made a very funny spoof of the Famous Five in 1982 called ‘Five Go Mad in Dorset’ which was shown in the UK on Channel 4. Well worth watching if you can find it.

    Like

    • Discovering these as an adult has been an interesting experience — I didnt get on with the first one, but find some really lovely writing in the others, simplistic though they may be. I’m not sure you’d be free to leave four children to play with a stray dog as frequently as happens here wtihout attracting some Social Services attention, too… 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s